-
Good morning viewers.

We all saw the appearance of the former president FW DE KLERK in the SONA2020. What is your take on that issue, do you think he truly deserved to be in parliament or do you agree with the EFF when they say it was against the constitution to invite the former president FW DE KLERK in parliament?  We also need to consider De Klerk's comments that he recently made claiming that apartheid was not a crime against humanity.

Comments

  1. nduduzo ngubaneMarch 5, 2020 at 1:09 AM

    he was not supposed to be there

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownMarch 5, 2020 at 3:00 AM


    The ANC should have never invited him and they were wrong to protect him.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownMarch 5, 2020 at 3:14 AM

    I think we shouldnt allow an oppressor in Parliament
    Plus the comments he made recently we're wrong because he was on

    ReplyDelete
  4. siphesihle mtshaliMarch 5, 2020 at 3:25 AM

    I think the Present was not support to be there at all

    ReplyDelete
  5. UnknownMarch 5, 2020 at 4:05 AM

    He shouldn't have came

    ReplyDelete
  6. UnknownMarch 5, 2020 at 4:12 AM

    If it against constitutional law, he was not suppose to come because he disturbed parliament peace

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mandisa ziqubuApril 1, 2020 at 6:08 AM

    The president should not have been there

    ReplyDelete
  8. UnknownApril 1, 2020 at 6:23 AM

    I see no problem with him being there because we now live in a free country

    ReplyDelete
  9. Miss N. B KHUMALOApril 1, 2020 at 6:26 AM

    He should not support to be here

    ReplyDelete
  10. UnknownApril 1, 2020 at 6:26 AM

    Well, he was not supposed to be there 😑

    ReplyDelete
  11. UnknownApril 1, 2020 at 6:26 AM

    Its an unfair act for him to appear in parliament after what he and his white friends did to our country.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ayanda Thubelihle MajolaApril 1, 2020 at 6:30 AM

    He was not suppose to be there and his comment on apartheid not being a crime just gave it more reason that he shouldn't be trusted. Yes he had an input to our freedom but i believe it was only because we as the black community were persistent on the journey to our freedom.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Siphesihle ZwaneApril 1, 2020 at 7:21 AM

    He wasn't supposed to be there😑

    ReplyDelete
  14. UnknownApril 2, 2020 at 2:41 AM

    I don't think he was supposed to be there from the first place , he's defending apartheid. He saw nothing wrong with apartheid because he's an apartheid beneficiary.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Thembalethu KhumaloApril 2, 2020 at 3:49 AM

    He shouldn't be trusted,and he wasn't supposed to be there

    ReplyDelete
  16. Kwenzakwakhe DlomoApril 2, 2020 at 5:32 AM

    He is not supposed to be here

    ReplyDelete
  17. AsandaNellyApril 2, 2020 at 8:34 AM

    Truly speaking there was no need for him to be there

    ReplyDelete
  18. Miss M N NdimandeApril 4, 2020 at 12:48 AM

    Wayeyaph???😐😐⚠️⚠️

    ReplyDelete
  19. ZamaButheleziApril 5, 2020 at 3:21 AM

    Yes he is part of South Africa but I think there was no need for him to be there.

    ReplyDelete
  20. MpilonhleDubeApril 5, 2020 at 9:23 AM

    There is no valid reason for him to be there

    ReplyDelete
  21. Cynthia s glamorous heelsApril 5, 2020 at 4:55 PM

    He was supposed to be there since he was invited,despite his comment,he respected the people who invited him by coming but am against his comment it is really painful to hear a black person speaking like that ,what humanity is talking about ,?how can a grown black man say it was humanity when so many people lost their lives

    ReplyDelete
  22. Philile NgubaneApril 9, 2020 at 7:25 AM

    He was not supposed to be there on the SONA2020.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Andiswa KhumaloApril 11, 2020 at 9:40 AM

    He was not suppose to be there njer finish

    ReplyDelete
  24. lungaApril 24, 2020 at 3:05 AM

    That is true Andiswa there was no valid reason for him because he is no longer a part of the parliament even if he was invited.... #asimfuningempiloyethuyonke.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

-
Image
"No alcohol will be sold during lockdown" Bheki Cele The Gauteng Liquor Forum wrote to President Cyril Ramaphosa arguing that it was their constitutional mandate to continue trading alcohol and threatening to approach the Constitutional Court for legal recourse. Image: Supplied POLITICS Selling booze under lockdown 'equal to conspiring for mass murder of poor': EFF said. The EFF has condemned requests by the Gauteng Liquor Forum for Covid-19 lockdown regulations to be relaxed and for government to allow the sale of alcohol. “This call is tantamount to conspiring for the mass murder of the poor, in particular black people. Selling alcohol during a war against Covid-19 to communities with historic existing problems of access to health care. malnutrition and general hunger only serves one purpose: to finish our people,” the EFF said. This comes after President Cyril Ramaphosa extended the 21-day lockdown by a further two weeks. The liquor forum wrote to R...
Read more